Français

An investment rather than an expense

Support comes at a cost. Changing nothing has a cost too, often higher and less visible. Here is what you need to compare the two before deciding.

These figures come from published studies and surveys. They give orders of magnitude, not a promise of results for your organisation.

What you are paying today

The cost of a team under strain appears on no invoice. It is paid in absences, departures and decisions that go nowhere.

See how this is calculated

The team-scale or budget-scale equivalents are calculations from the published figures: for example, CHF 6.5 billion divided by 5.24 million working people in Switzerland (Federal Statistical Office, end of 2022), or 12 billion days by 3.4 billion people in employment worldwide (ILO, 2023).

Transformations that miss their target

See the caveats on these rates

These rates come mostly from consulting firms. Research calls for caution: no solid empirical study sets a precise failure rate (Hughes, 2011). Surveys still converge: a large share of transformations miss their objectives, and each failure costs the investment and the teams' time.

Digital projects that overrun budgets and schedules

See a Swiss example

In Switzerland, the Federal Tax Administration's INSIEME IT project was abandoned in 2012 after about ten years. Parliamentary committees found shortcomings in management and oversight, and poorly defined responsibilities (Swiss Parliament, 2014, in French).

AI projects that fail for lack of a shared problem

See what makes these projects fail

In both studies, technology is not the first culprit: what is missing is a well-defined, shared problem, and an organisation that learns to build the tool into its work.

When concerns do not travel up: the human cost

As René Rupert points out, a project's failure can also be counted in human lives. In 1986, the Challenger shuttle broke apart shortly after launch and its seven astronauts died. The commission of inquiry found a serious flaw in the decision-making process: the engineers' doubts about the seals in cold weather were not conveyed as such to the managers who approved the launch (Rogers Commission, 1986).

This is what hierarchical dialogue works on: making sure what teams know reaches those who decide.

Consulting that creates dependency

When the know-how stays with the provider, each new challenge calls for a new assignment. Mariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington show how this repeated reliance weakens the capabilities of businesses and governments (The Big Con, 2023). In Switzerland, the federal government spent CHF 673 million in 2024 on external services and consultants, about CHF 75 per inhabitant (Blick, 2026, in French).

My approach aims for the opposite: unless otherwise agreed, the methods are published under free licences, and each assignment ends with pointers to carry on without me.

What you can gain

Reported gains vary widely from one study to another. Together, they outline a range, from modest to very high.

  • The most engaged teams are 23% more profitable

    Compared with the least engaged, they also have 78% less absenteeism and 70% more thriving employees. The analysis covers 183,806 teams in 90 countries.

    At team scale: where the least engaged team has 10 days of absence, the most engaged has about 2; for every CHF 100 of profit, CHF 123.

    Gallup, 2024 meta-analysis

  • Mental health at work returns 5 times what it costs

    This is the average return measured in the United Kingdom: £5 back for every £1 invested.

    Deloitte, 2020

  • Results × 3

    At Nescafé, Curt Blattner applied the Three Contracts of emerging change with 250, then 500 people. He estimates that his unit's results were multiplied by three.

    Curt Blattner, 2020 · Read the story

Autonomy, participation, open source: successes in figures

  • Self-governing nursing teams provide care with a third fewer hours

    At Buurtzorg in the Netherlands, self-organising teams of 10 to 12 home care nurses spend 108 hours per client per year, compared with 168 elsewhere. Total cost, medical care included, stays close to average.

    For 10 people cared for: about 600 fewer hours of care a year.

    KPMG 2015 and Ernst & Young 2009, via the Commonwealth Fund

  • With participatory budgeting, almost every household is connected to water

    In Porto Alegre, the share of households connected to water and sanitation rose from 75% to 98% between 1988 and 1997, and the number of schools quadrupled. Across Brazil, participatory budgeting is associated with a sharper fall in infant mortality.

    Out of 100 households: 23 more connected.

    WRI, via SDG16+; Touchton and Wampler, 2020

  • Every euro invested in open source returns 65 to 95 euros to the economy

    In 2018, about €1 billion invested by companies in the European Union had an impact of €65 to 95 billion on its GDP. Without open source, companies would spend about 3.5 times more on software.

    For a company that spends CHF 10,000 a year on software: about CHF 35,000 without open source.

    European Commission, 2021; Harvard Business School, 2024

Closing the autonomy gap

René Rupert sets the useful level of autonomy according to the complexity of each activity, then compares it with the autonomy people perceive and the autonomy they want. The gaps show where to act: where control holds people back, and where freedom lacks bearings. I mapped these gaps with the team at Fujitsu (report, 2013, in French) and with 84 teachers at the Lausanne Hospitality School (EHL).

See the limits of these gains

Gains are not automatic. A meta-analysis finds medical costs fall by about US$3.27 and absenteeism costs by about US$2.73 for every dollar spent on workplace wellness programmes, that is US$3,270 and US$2,730 per US$1,000 (Baicker et al., 2010). But a randomised trial found no effect of a standard programme on health, spending or job performance after 18 months (Song and Baicker, 2019). That is why I start from the team's situation and from what it decides for itself, rather than from a ready-made programme.

What I invested to know where to strike the hammer

The story is well known: an expert bills for one hammer strike, one franc for striking, the rest for knowing where to strike. Here is what that knowledge cost me.

See what is not counted and the method

Not counted: salary forgone during my studies and 870 hours of training in “hostile” environments. Method: public reference costs (Federal Statistical Office, SERI, cantons) and published course prices; details on request.

How much to budget

What the professions whose skills my background combines charge

Years of education after compulsory school, full cost of studies and hourly rates of independent professionals in Switzerland, in Swiss francs.
ProfessionYears of post-compulsory educationFull cost of studiesHourly rate
Technology lawyer9–10≈ 402,600≈ 350–500
Organisational development consultant8–9≈ 432,600150–300
Agile IT project manager6–7≈ 452,800120–250
Artificial intelligence researcher11–13≈ 539,700≈ 150–310
Research and development director11–13≈ 555,700≈ 140–205
Fabio Balli17 full time, over 26 years623,500See below
Psychiatrist, consultation (TARDOC)15–17≈ 646,100≈ 210
See the sources and method

Hourly rates: for lawyers, CHF 200 to 500 in Switzerland, with specialists in the middle to upper part of the range (GetYourLawyer, 2025); for organisational development, CHF 150 to 300 from an experienced to an expert profile, and for IT consulting, CHF 120 to 250 (Magic Heidi); for AI, CHF 1,200 to 2,500 per day of consulting (Dialogis, 2026); for research and development leadership, 1% of the annual salary per day of assignment (Swiss Interim Management, 2023), applied to the salaries published by Payscale; for psychiatry, an estimate based on the TARDOC point value of about CHF 0.90. 8-hour days. Years of education: from the regulatory minimum to the estimated average length. Full cost of studies: same method as mine, including continuing education up to age 45. Values preceded by ≈ are estimates.

Prices charged in my field

Price ranges charged by independent professionals in facilitation, team support, training and participatory research, by type of organisation.

Ranges charged, in Swiss francs, excluding VAT and travel expenses
ServiceInstitutions and companiesAssociationsCitizen collectives
Individual support, per hour200–260140–160100–120 depending on income
Training, per classroom hour, preparation included180–300120–150100
Day of design, preparation or research1,600–1,8001,000–1,100400–600
Day of leadership team support1,800–2,2001,000–1,300400–700
Day of large-group facilitation2,000–2,4001,200–1,400500–800
See what these ranges include
  • These ranges usually include a reasonable amount of preparation and follow-up time. For citizen collectives, third-party funding may be possible: we can discuss it during the 20-minute call.

The amount of each assignment depends on its duration, the number of people and the deliverables: we set it together during the 20-minute call.

I give priority to projects that create resources the general public can freely reuse; this is entirely compatible with a traditional business model. Unless otherwise agreed, the methods and processes I put in place may be documented and published in scientific publications under a free licence.

On this compatibility: the guide to the contribution economy by Lourdin (2019) (in French) and the economic analysis of open source by Lerner and Tirole (2002).

Working languages
Bilingual in French and English; German and Italian for simple individual sessions only.
Locations
Meetings by video call or in person, depending on what is possible. Depending on the contract, available to travel internationally; free to work in Switzerland, the European Union and Canada. Visa facilitation in some Commonwealth countries.

Sources

These figures come from published studies and surveys. They give orders of magnitude, not a promise of results for your organisation.

See the 39 sources
  1. Health Promotion Switzerland, Job Stress Index 2022
  2. World Health Organization, Mental health at work (fact sheet)
  3. Gallup, State of the Global Workplace, 2026
  4. Gallup, Q12 Meta-Analysis, 11th edition, 2024
  5. Boston Consulting Group, Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success, 2020
  6. Hughes, M. (2011). Do 70 per cent of all organizational change initiatives really fail? Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 451–464
  7. Blattner, C. (2020). The Heartbeat of Excellence. LID Publishing
  8. Mazzucato, M. and Collington, R. (2023). The Big Con. Penguin
  9. Blick, external consultants of the Swiss federal government, 19 January 2026 (in French)
  10. Bloch, M., Blumberg, S. and Laartz, J. (2012). Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value. McKinsey and University of Oxford
  11. Flyvbjerg, B. and Budzier, A. (2011). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harvard Business Review
  12. Ryseff, J., De Bruhl, B. and Newberry, S. (2024). The Root Causes of Failure for Artificial Intelligence Projects and How They Can Succeed. RAND Corporation
  13. MIT, Project NANDA (2025). The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 (summary by Virtualization Review)
  14. Finance and Control Committees, investigation report on INSIEME, 2014 (in French)
  15. Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (Rogers Commission), chapter V, 1986
  16. Gray, B., Sarnak, D. and Burgers, J. (2015). Home care by self-governing nursing teams: the Netherlands' Buurtzorg model. Commonwealth Fund
  17. SDG16+, Participatory budgeting in Brazil (based on Abers et al., WRI, 2018)
  18. Touchton, M. and Wampler, B. (2020). Public engagement for public health. Development in Practice, 30(5), 681–686
  19. Balli, F. (2023). Healing Communities. What if we collectively had the capacity to overcome any crisis in a matter of days? Doctoral thesis, Concordia University
  20. Hogarth, R. M., Lejarraga, T. and Soyer, E. (2015). The two settings of kind and wicked learning environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 379–385
  21. Hoffmann, M., Nagle, F. and Zhou, Y. (2024). The Value of Open Source Software. Harvard Business School, working paper 24-038
  22. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge (2024). Open Source Software: The $9 Trillion Resource Companies Take for Granted
  23. European Commission, study on the impact of open source software on the European economy, 2021
  24. Deloitte UK, Mental health and employers, 2020
  25. Baicker, K., Cutler, D. and Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs, 29(2), 304–311
  26. Song, Z. and Baicker, K. (2019). Randomised trial of a workplace wellness programme, JAMA (summary by Harvard Medical School)
  27. Balli, F. (2013). Performance durable en entreprises : co-construire dans l'autonomie (Fujitsu, in French)
  28. GetYourLawyer, What does a lawyer cost?, 2025 (in German)
  29. Magic Heidi, Hourly Rates for Swiss Freelancers in 2026
  30. Dialogis, What does AI consulting cost in Switzerland?, 2026 (in German)
  31. Heidler, C. (2023). Pay for interim managers. Swiss Interim Management (in German)
  32. Payscale, R&D director salary in Switzerland
  33. Magic Heidi, guide to setting your prices as a freelancer, 2025 (in French)
  34. Lourdin, F. (2019). EC1: Économie de la contribution et entrepreneuriat, knowledge base v0.9. Geneva (in French)
  35. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002). Some Simple Economics of Open Source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234
  36. SERI, reference costs of universities 2021–2024 (in French)
  37. Federal Statistical Office, employed persons in the 4th quarter of 2022 (via kmu.admin.ch, in French)
  38. International Labour Organization, global labour force in 2023 (via UC Davis)
  39. Federal Statistical Office, permanent resident population at 31 December 2024 (in French)

Considering working together?

Briefly describe your situation. I will reply to see whether my approach can help.

Book a 20-minute call